PECULIARITIES OF USING TARIFFS FOR INTERRUPTION IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE ELECTRICITY MARKET OF UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/1813-5420.1.2021.242187Keywords:
restrictions on electricity consumers, the cost of interruption for the consumer, interruption tariffs, econometric model, consumer surveys, hybrid modelAbstract
The use of schedules to disconnect consumers from electricity to reduce the load on the UES of Ukraine is an outdated model and may not meet the standards and requirements of the new model of the electricity market in Ukraine. The study of consumer desires and needs is a very promising area in improving the efficiency of the balancing mechanism in the electricity market and is an important factor in calculating interruption tariffs. In this paper, to minimize costs due to power outages, the consumer considers the creation of a hybrid econometric approach that combines the advantages and minimizes the disadvantages of two models: the popular consumer survey model and the econometric model. An econometric model that uses the added value created by a group of consumers for the year is a practical way to estimate the cost of planned outages. The method of consumer surveys is the most popular tool for assessing reliability in the electricity market. The paper proposes to use publicly available consumer data collected through a simple survey of consumers about their actions in case of undesirable power outages, taking into account the specifics of their work. It is worth noting that this study focuses on the interruption scenario that will lead to the highest shutdown costs, it covers only winter outages in the afternoon and eliminates the effect of the difference between time of day and season.
References
Звіт за 2019 рік про результати моніторингу безпеки постачання електричної енергії
Report on the results of the National Commission for State Regulation in the Fields of Energy and Utilities in 2019 (hereinafter the NCRECP Reports) (NCRECP Resolution of 27.05.2020 No975);
Report on conformity assessment (sufficiency) of generating capacities (hereinafter - the Assessment Report), (resolution of the National Commission for Regulation of Economic Competition dated 13.03.2020 No605);
Transmission system development plan for 2020 - 2029, which was approved by the National Commission for Regulation of Economic Competition on March 13, 2020;
Report of the National Commission for Electricity Market Regulation on monitoring the functioning of the wholesale electricity market in the IV quarter of 2019;
Report of the National Commission for Regulation of Economic Competition on monitoring the functioning of the retail electricity market in the I, II, III, IV quarters of 2019;
Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the period up to 2035 "Security, Energy Efficiency, Competitiveness" (hereinafter - the Energy Strategy), approved by the order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated 18.08.2017. No605-r.
Zamulko A., Veremiichuk Y. Organization of consumer restrictions on retail electricity market: legal issues. Power engineering economics, technique, ecology. 2018. No1. С. 23-32. ISSN 2308-7382 (Print).
On the electricity market: Law of Ukraine No. 2019-VIII of April 13, 2017.
Silvast A, Heine P, Lehtonen M, Kivikko K, Mäkinen A, Järventausta P. Sähkönjakelun keskeytyksestä aiheutuva haitta (Customer Interruption Costs in Finland). Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto: Teknillinen korkeakoulu; 2005.
Billinton JR et al. Methods to consider customer interruption costs in power systems analysis. CIGRE Task Force 2001.
Mok YL, Chung TS. Prediction of domestic, industrial and commercial interruption costs by relational approach. In: 1997 Fourth international conference on advances in power system control, operation and management.
Choi SB, Kim DK, Jeong SH, Ryu HS. Evaluation of the customer interruption cost taking into consideration macro economic approach in Korea. In: Proc. 2002 international conference on power system technology.
Praktiknjo AJ, Hähnel A, Erdmann G. Assessing energy supply security: outage costs in private households. Energy Policy 2011;39(12):7825–33.
Tollefson G, Billinton R, Wacker G, Chan E, Aweya J. Canadian customer survey to assess power system reliability worth. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1994;9(1):443–50.
Pandey M. Reliability worth assessment in a developing country – commercial and industrial survey results. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1999;14(4):1232–7.
Kjølle GH, Samdal K, Singh B, Kvitastein OA. Customer costs related to interruptions and voltage problems: methodology and results. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008;23(3):1030–8.
Herman R, Gaunt CT. Direct and indirect measurement of residential and commercial CIC: preliminary findings from South African Surveys. In: Proc. 2008 of the 10th international conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems, 2008. pp. 1–7.
Chowdhury AA, Mielnik TC, Lawton LE, Sullivan MJ, Katz A, Koval DO. System reliability worth assessment using the customer survey approach. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2009;45(1):317–22.
Baarsma BE, Hop JP. Pricing power outages in the Netherlands. Energy 2009;34(9):1378–86.
Kufeoglu S, Lehtonen M. Customer interruption costs estimations for service sectors via customer survey method: a case study. Int Rev Electr Eng 2013;8(5):1532–8.
Kufeoglu S, Lehtonen M. A novel hybrid approach to estimate customer interruption costs for industry sectors. Eng, Spec Issue Power Electr Eng 2013;5(10A):34–40.
Kufeoglu S, Lehtonen M, Evaluation of power outage costs for industrial sectors in Finland. In: IET Conference Publications, Stockholm, (615 CP), 1044, 10–13 June 2013.
Lehtonen M, Lemström B. Comparison of the methods for assessing the customers’ outage costs. In: International Conference on Energy Management and Power Delivery, Proceedings of EMPD, 1995.
Jonnavithula A, Billinton R. Features that influence composite power system reliability worth assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1997;12(4):1536–41.
Sullivan MJ, Mercurio MG, Schellenberg JA, Eto JH. How to estimate the value of service reliability improvements. IEEE Power Energy Soc Gen Meet 2010:1–5.
Kjølle GH, Samdal K, Singh B, Kvitastein OA. Customer costs related to interruptions and voltage problems: methodology and results. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008;23(3):1030–8.
Billinton R, Tollefson G, Wacker G. Assessment of electric service reliability worth. In: Third international conference on probabilistic methods applied to electric power systems, 1991.
Samdal K, Kjølle GH, Singh B, Kvitastein O. Interruption costs and consumer valuation of reliability of service in a liberalized power market. In: International conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems, 2006.
ISSN 2308-7382 (Online)
ISSN 1813-5420 (Print). Енергетика: економіка, технології, екологія. 2021. No 1
Lehtonen M, Silvast A, Heine P, Kivikko K, Mäkinen A, Järventausta P. Outage costs in electrical distribution networks – a Finnish study. In: Nordic Distribution and Asset Management Conference NORDAC, Stockholm, 21–22 August 2006.
Kivikko K, Makinen A, Jarventausta P, Silvast A, Heine P, Lehtonen M. Comparison of reliability worth analysis methods: data analysis and elimination methods. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2008;2(3):321–9.
Sullivan M, Mercurio M, Schellenberg J, Freeman M. Estimated value of service reliability for electric utility customers in the United States. Ernest Orlando Lawrence, Berkeley, CA, USA: Energy Analysis Department; 2009.
Kristina Hamachi LaCommare, Joseph H. Eto. Understanding the cost of power interruptions to US electricity consumers. In: Ernest Orlando Lawrence, Berkeley National Laboratory, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
- Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
- Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
- Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).
