FEATURES OF TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION OF DECISIONS IN PROSPECTIVE PLANNING OF POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/1813-5420.2.2020.222666

Ключові слова:

distribution transformers, information uncertainty, interval analysis, game theory

Анотація

Feasibility study is an important tool that is actively used to substantiate the best options in the design of various power facilities. The example of the problem of choosing the nominal power of distribution transformers shows that in solving this problem, given the rather long planning horizon, it is necessary to take into account the uncertainty of at least such factors as the nature and dynamics of electricity cost, loads, operating cost. Due to the lack of sufficient statistics, it is proposed to set the appropriate parameters in the form of intervals of the possible values. As a result, A will also be represented as an interval value. In this case, when comparing the discounted costs corresponding to different alternatives, the main difficulty lies in choosing a procedure for comparing interval values. There are several approaches to comparing overlapping intervals. It is shown that with an increase in the planning horizon, the probability of distinguishable intervals decreases sharply. This makes it difficult to make well grounded decisions about the preference of one of the options. The possibility of using the apparatus of interval analysis in focusing on both traditional arithmetic operations and generalized Hansen interval arithmetic (which allows one to reduce the uncertainty when performing arithmetic operations) for this purpose is analyzed. It is substantiated that a more effective approach in this case is to use the apparatus of game theory. In order to discretize the problem, ЛПτ sequences were used that permits one to select points most uniformly distributed in the n- dimensional cube. A series of experimental calculations was performed, in which it was shown that considering the factor of information uncertainty significantly affects the justification of the optimal nominal power of distribution transformers in the design of power supply systems.

Посилання

1. Afanasyev A.P., Grinkrug M.S., Tkacheva Yu.I. Locating transformer substations in the low voltage power supply network using the cumulative geodetic matrix distances, Russian Internet Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2014, Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 17-20.

2. SOU-N MEV 45.2-37471933-44: 2011 Enlargement of indicators of productivity of production from 6 kV to 150 kV and power lines from 0.38 kV to 150 kV. Norms (with wines), Vidokremlenii pidrozdil "Science and Technology Center for Power Engineering" of the State Enterprise "National Energy Company Ukrenergo", Kiev, 2018 p.

3. Ramon E. Moore; Interval Analysis; Prentice Hall; 1966, 159 pp.

4.H. Ishibuchi, H. Tanaka, Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function, Eur. J. Oper. Res. V. 48 Issue 2, 1990, p. 219-225.

5. Sengupta A, Pal T, K. (2009) Fuzzy preference ordering of interval numbers in decision problems. Springer, Berlin, 238 p.

6. B. Q. Hu and S. Wang. A novel approach in uncertain programming part i: New arithmetic and order relation for interval numbers. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2 (4): 351–371, 2006.

7. Sevastianov P, Róg P and Karczewski K A Probabilistic approach to fuzzy and crisp interval ordering task, Task Quarterly, V. 7, No. 1, 2003, 147-156.

8.dtec-kem.com.ua/ckeditor_assets/dd-ee/2016/OOE_E Dohovir Fiz.osoba.pdf.

9.https://vse.energy/news/pec-news/electro/915-ee-price-2019-i-vi.

Hansen E. A generalized interval arithmetic / E. Hansen // In interval mathematics: [Ed. By K. Nickel]. Interval Mathematics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. V. 29. - 1975, - p. 7-18.

11. V. A. Popov, E. S Yarmolyuk, і Said Banuzade Sakhragard, "The peculiarities of the interval analysis for an hour to choose the optimal options, "Bulletin of the Vinnytsia Polytechnic Institute, No. 1, p. 171-174, 2012.

12. Wentzel E. S. Operations Research: objectives, principles, methodology. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 206 p.

13. Germeyer Yu. B. Games with non-opposite interests. - Moscow: Nauka, 1976 .-- 328 p.

14. Sobol IM, Statnikov IR Choice of optimal parameters in problems with many criteria. - Moscow: Nauka,1981, 107 p.

15. Sobol I. M., Levitan Yu.L. Getting points evenly spaced in a multidimensional cube. - M .:, 1976 .-- 37p. (Preprint / Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, No. 40).

16. Karlin S. Mathematical methods in game theory, programming, economics. M .: Mir, 1964, 837

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2020-12-23

Номер

Розділ

ENERGY SYSTEMS AND COMPLEXES